Perak Drama

These few days we've shown a confusing poltical drama occuring in Perak..All the big guns of Malaysia political scene are directing their attention to the state where BN is trying to take over the state government..this occur due to the return of Bota assemblyman back to UMNO and 3 PKR assemblyman quitting the party and become independance and announced their support for BN to be the ruling party of the state of Perak...but of course,the PKR government won't give up that easily..a lot of things they've said and done to prevent this from happening...they claim that the move organized by UMNO is unethical and is a violation of democracy in Malaysia as to them MP are voted based on their party.....PKR suporters claim UMNO playing cheap tricks to buy the assemblyman in order to rule Perak...

deja vu isn't it?

when DSAI announced the 16th Sept 08,the crossovers of MP...non of PKR supporters and component party claim democracy,claim violation of constitution..they even support him..is what he did the right thing? no doubt what UMNO did now(if it is what they did because Najib didn't claim anything about making PKR people cross over to BN) is not the right thing but why condemn people not the actions? when Anwar plan on buying MPs,its the right thing..no problem asked...if UMNO did the same thing its a no-no, a sin,an immoral conduct,violation of constitution..bla bla bla...
im not supporting UMNO here nor putting down PKR,im just feeling sick of the supporters which claim they support Anwar because what he did was right and for the rakyat...actually they blindly support him for his popularist concept of approach...no doubt he may did some great things during his time in the government..and some bad things too..but hey,don't be obssessed with a person..if what he did was wrong,its wrong..no person can make a wrong thing right just because he/she did it...if it is wrong,whoever did it is wrong...if this is how Anwar controlling the PKR,what makes you think it would be different with the current BN...much different? i don't think so...so to all extreme supporters of the political party in Malaysia,please don't be to extremist...be rational....don't blindly support something until you are blinded from reality..what wrong is wrong and what right is right...

frog...

Litoria nasuta, the Australian rocket frog can leap up to 2 metres....astonishing...maybe the scientist haven't heard of Malaysian politic frogs....can leap between parties....Bota assemblymen who recently crossed to PKR,and the latest one is news about two PKR assemblymen is going to crossover to BN...hm..what say the big people? i guess it's alright for the BN because that's what they did before to DAP assemblymen,buy them....ask Datuk Joseph Pairin Kitingan...how DSAI during his reign in UMNO nicely architect the defects on several MP in Sabah to win over the government....i think it's alright for PAS too...as Datuk Mustafa Ali said,it's morally right for BN MP to crossover but a sin for those from PR to cross...but what say the people?

im just a one person view..estimated value of one vote only...since majority is democracy,so my view means nothing except that im leaving in my own world where 1 is a majority...u can say bullshit about how a vote can make the difference..ever heard of anyone winning elections with one vote majority?

maybe i would have effect if this one vote can influence another one vote..and together,two votes can make a difference...not yet...we need more..and more....we need to influence..and how do we influence? we can lie...or we can lie..why lie? because we can never please everyone's desire..so to win over everyone,we need to pretend we can fulfill what they want....

who is assemblymen? person voted by people of an area to represent them....

first of all,why is he voted? for his party?for himself? or for the people...if it is for the people,why the party make a lot of fuss when the representetive changes party? or is the party has its own agenda to fulfill that it requires the MP...if that is the reason,then the forming of a politcal party is to pursue an agenda favourable to the party only...then who works for the people? so is the party agenda coherent with the people's agenda? if it is coherent then i can see no problem in hopping party because even if the assemblymen is in another party,he will still work for the people because the people's agenda is the same with the other party...or is the other party has a different agenda...and is it coherent with the people's? if it is not,then the other party has its own agenda which is not for the people..and why hope to another party? is it because the assemblymen no longer work for the people? then why become assemblymen?

ok,im starting to be confuse here....who's agenda is we working on anyway...the people's or the party?

people's agenda =party'agenda
party's agenda=party2's agenda(we assume party2's working for the people)
assemblymen's agenda remain the same
so nothing has change basically....

but what if the party's agenda is different...

party's agenda =/= party2's agenda
MP switch to party 2 because of its agenda...so there will be two possibilities....

1. MP's agenda = people's agenda = party2's agenda (therefore the switching)
2. MP's agenda = people's agenda =/= party's agenda (therefore the switching)

but intially the MP is voted under the first party agenda so we will assume.....
people's agenda=party's agenda

so which one has the same agenda as the people's?
if both has a different agenda then who has the agenda for the people?
if both party claim their agenda is for the people,then it will be like this....

party's agenda = people's agenda
party2's agenda = people's agenda
party's agenda = party2's agenda

so why political party?

am i right? hahahaha..the mathematical equation solves it all...


if only life is as simple as mathematical equation....