haih...haihhhhhhhhhhhhh

Just after few days in Malaysia,it now seems to me the political scene in Malaysia is more shitty than it is on paper....seriously,i think the situation now is quite bad...dh la ekonomi tgh teruk...politik pn teruk....for this few years it seems Malaysia's development is on a stagnant stage....what have we done so far?? i mean,compare it with the times of Tun Dr M...nowadays it seems the politicians are more interested in keeping themselves in power rather then development,which is the true purpose of them being in the parliament...everyday when we see the live broadcast of parliament in tv,it disgust me to see them hurling words and fighting with each other over stupid issues which obviously doesn't relate to the people..what are we paying them for? why we pay tax? to see them quarrel in the tv and let them drive merz around town with Datuk or Tan Sri title on front of them??? the real purpose for them to be in the parliament is to discuss the well being of people,not to quarrel over differences in party or personal life..today,there's one entry that really attracts me in The Star newspaper...there's a letter from someone urging those in power to stop playing low life dirty politic to gain or stay in power and urge them to focus on development instead..i totally agree with that view..those politician should stop the quarreling and start doing their job...the toll goes up by this Sunday..why don't they debate about that instead of quarreling about bullet sent to Karpal...let the police do their job and in the mean time the politicians should do their job too..the letter also state directly to the PKR and BN to call for truce...haha..quite funny to me..but i think it is right..they should quit on taking over each others place to gain power..PKR should stop about the 916 thing...stop thinking of taking over the federal...the BN should stop all stupid things they are doing..stop taking over other states...call for truce and work for the people like you are supposed to do...if the people like you,they will vote for you in the next general election so right now JUST DO YOUR WORK goddamnit....we need developments....while the MPs are quarelling over nude photo and bullet in the parliament,streamyx are getting sucker and sucker each day...so why don't they do their work and put up another ISP or at least urge streamyx to invest more in bandwitdh...

to streamyx: stop robbing your customer...we are paying for a service so give the service we paid for..if you provide UNLIMITED service,don't throttle the p2p...don't use fair policy as your cover...if you don't have enough bandwidth,INCREASE them goddamnit...whats the use we pay u every month...for ur ceo to buy merc? use the money to increase ur bandwidth...if ur to0 shitty stingy to spend more money for ur customer,then stop taking in more customer because it will eat up more bandwidth u moron! haih...i wonder where those streamyx engineer graduate from....haih.....Airtel services are better then streamyx...haih~~~~

India

just when i was happily thinking about going home,a story from a friend of mine stirred up my feelings....India,never fails to dissappoint me..my friend went to BSNL to pay his internet bill and he gave the cashier 1000rp for the bill mounted at 843rp..he is supposed to get back change of 157rp...but the cashier(this does consists of almost all cashier in India) doesn't have the correct amount of change gave my friend 60rp and said,"give me 3rp and i'll give u 100rp"....is this the correct way to serve your customer? ask them for a change,not you going to search for it? so,the dispute went on as my friend doesn't have the correct change too(this is understandable since normal people doesn't always carry correct change at all time)..so this rude cashier snatched the receipt from my friend,gave him a 100rp note and said"u go search for 3rp then i give u back ur receipt"...is that the way it should be?threatening a customer? no wonder India is like how it is...then my friend being in a hurry wanted to see the viva list let go of the dispute..he said,"nevermind,just keep the change"....as my friend was about to leave,the cashier replied sarcastically,"if like that easy right?"...........now you tell me,is that a cashier working for a monthly income or a beggar scraping for bits of leftovers? and this reminds me of how it used to happen to me when i order food here...usually my order will never sum up to a round figure,so of course,a balance is required for instance if my food was 65rp,i gave 100rp,i need 35rp back....how i wish it was that easy...but sometimes,those delivery boy will said that they have no change and offer me a chocolate instead for the 5rp....now you tell me,if im short on 5rp the next time i ordered from him can he accept chocolate from me as payment? if he can then im gladly will accept the chocolate......hahah...


10rp = rm 0.73

now its not the value of money we consider here...but the morality,service and social relationship...if they keep acting like a beggar,we treat them like beggar...so why angry when people look down upon u? haih~ india india india...incredible india..yeah right

finally....

yeahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh~! oo0o yeahh.....hahah..just finished my first year medical examination...and hopefully i will move through second year this coming end of march....relieved after one year of study..but hey,the result is not out yet and anything could happen.. *sigh* anyway,i did my paper well(i think) and hopefully my practical all goes well....im planning to repay my sleep debt this holiday..haha! i went sleepless like two weeks due to the exams...my mind right now is too overwhelmed with the thought of finishing the exam so i can't find anything decent to write or diss..haha...so i'll just be going..till then~ bye bye manipal..see you in one month time

Perak Drama

These few days we've shown a confusing poltical drama occuring in Perak..All the big guns of Malaysia political scene are directing their attention to the state where BN is trying to take over the state government..this occur due to the return of Bota assemblyman back to UMNO and 3 PKR assemblyman quitting the party and become independance and announced their support for BN to be the ruling party of the state of Perak...but of course,the PKR government won't give up that easily..a lot of things they've said and done to prevent this from happening...they claim that the move organized by UMNO is unethical and is a violation of democracy in Malaysia as to them MP are voted based on their party.....PKR suporters claim UMNO playing cheap tricks to buy the assemblyman in order to rule Perak...

deja vu isn't it?

when DSAI announced the 16th Sept 08,the crossovers of MP...non of PKR supporters and component party claim democracy,claim violation of constitution..they even support him..is what he did the right thing? no doubt what UMNO did now(if it is what they did because Najib didn't claim anything about making PKR people cross over to BN) is not the right thing but why condemn people not the actions? when Anwar plan on buying MPs,its the right thing..no problem asked...if UMNO did the same thing its a no-no, a sin,an immoral conduct,violation of constitution..bla bla bla...
im not supporting UMNO here nor putting down PKR,im just feeling sick of the supporters which claim they support Anwar because what he did was right and for the rakyat...actually they blindly support him for his popularist concept of approach...no doubt he may did some great things during his time in the government..and some bad things too..but hey,don't be obssessed with a person..if what he did was wrong,its wrong..no person can make a wrong thing right just because he/she did it...if it is wrong,whoever did it is wrong...if this is how Anwar controlling the PKR,what makes you think it would be different with the current BN...much different? i don't think so...so to all extreme supporters of the political party in Malaysia,please don't be to extremist...be rational....don't blindly support something until you are blinded from reality..what wrong is wrong and what right is right...

helmet and serban....

A student of an Islamic school in Malaysia, Ahmad Nasir Darus was found guilty riding a motorcycle while wearing a serban...
The student was fined RM90 but he refuse to pay the fine,and went to jail instead..for the reason of defending the sunnah...
A lot of other religions has a same style of having a head dress to cover their head...be it Sikh,Islam,Hindu,Jews...Yes,even Jews....
If it is a religous practice why he was fine?
If Islam was a perfect religion, why could be such rules to wear this serban when it may be dangerous to someone when riding a motorcycle....
Well,don't blame Islam...Blame the student...Clearly he doesn't understand Islam....

Narrated Anas bin Malik: In the year of the conquest of Mecca the Prophet entered Mecca, wearing a helmet on his head. (al-Bukhari, Book no. 72, Hadith no. 699)

Sunnah is like a tradition or lifestyle of the prophet Muhammad (p.b.u.h) which us,his ummah should follow as he is our idol and prophet...and Muhammad(p.b.u.h) a prophet he is know the danger of not wearing a helmet under certain situation.....

Narrated Sahl: When the helmet of the Prophet was smashed on his head and blood covered his face and one of his front teeth got broken, 'Ali brought the water in his shield and Fatima the Prophet's daughter) washed him. But when she saw that the bleeding increased more by the water, she took a mat, burnt it, and placed the ashes on the wound of the Prophet and so the blood stopped oozing out. (al-Bukhari, Book no. 52, Hadith no. 152)

The bolded sentence above(for non muslim readers) are hadith or oral traditions of the great prophet Muhammad(p.b.u.h) which are important as a guidance of our way of life...now it is clearly shown how the prophet clearly asks us to to wear helmet in a certain situation demanding it....

the quote i hated the most,"ajal tu kt tangan Tuhan..kalau nk mati tu mati jugak x kire la mcm mane sekalipun"....
if it is like that,why look right and left before you cross the road? death is inevitable so why don't you just let life takes you all the way?
it is because survival is men basic instinct..all being,human and animal has the basic knowledge of survival..even God wants us to strive to survive..self suicide is a big sin in most religion...its true death is inevitable,but only after u tried so hard to survive....

Attention!

Thank you for visiting my blog...please feel free to to see what my sponsor has to offer on the right side and bottom end of the blog...thank you.. ^^ (i will add this message for every post from now on)

stupidest of all stupid creature(fuck my english)

sorry for the f word above and the upcoming cursings....just want to state that TEMPE IS ONE MOTHERFUCKING STUPID BASTARDS.....why?
they drive by looking on their left or right...yes! not in front...they look onto the left and right and talk with the person next to them....if there's no one next to them,they talk by themselves because they are crazy stupid motherfucking bastard...when they crash on someone when driving while looking with their motherfucking ears,they will blame that someone..
"this is mainroad no"
"before u go into mainroad u shud see no"

yeah right mister...i can see all that i want but if u decide to drive with ur ears,u will bang me no matter what...if u don't know how to drive,don't drive....don't blame others when u bang someone while driving with ur ears..ears are for hearing god damn it....not for looking...stupid bastard....

frog...

Litoria nasuta, the Australian rocket frog can leap up to 2 metres....astonishing...maybe the scientist haven't heard of Malaysian politic frogs....can leap between parties....Bota assemblymen who recently crossed to PKR,and the latest one is news about two PKR assemblymen is going to crossover to BN...hm..what say the big people? i guess it's alright for the BN because that's what they did before to DAP assemblymen,buy them....ask Datuk Joseph Pairin Kitingan...how DSAI during his reign in UMNO nicely architect the defects on several MP in Sabah to win over the government....i think it's alright for PAS too...as Datuk Mustafa Ali said,it's morally right for BN MP to crossover but a sin for those from PR to cross...but what say the people?

im just a one person view..estimated value of one vote only...since majority is democracy,so my view means nothing except that im leaving in my own world where 1 is a majority...u can say bullshit about how a vote can make the difference..ever heard of anyone winning elections with one vote majority?

maybe i would have effect if this one vote can influence another one vote..and together,two votes can make a difference...not yet...we need more..and more....we need to influence..and how do we influence? we can lie...or we can lie..why lie? because we can never please everyone's desire..so to win over everyone,we need to pretend we can fulfill what they want....

who is assemblymen? person voted by people of an area to represent them....

first of all,why is he voted? for his party?for himself? or for the people...if it is for the people,why the party make a lot of fuss when the representetive changes party? or is the party has its own agenda to fulfill that it requires the MP...if that is the reason,then the forming of a politcal party is to pursue an agenda favourable to the party only...then who works for the people? so is the party agenda coherent with the people's agenda? if it is coherent then i can see no problem in hopping party because even if the assemblymen is in another party,he will still work for the people because the people's agenda is the same with the other party...or is the other party has a different agenda...and is it coherent with the people's? if it is not,then the other party has its own agenda which is not for the people..and why hope to another party? is it because the assemblymen no longer work for the people? then why become assemblymen?

ok,im starting to be confuse here....who's agenda is we working on anyway...the people's or the party?

people's agenda =party'agenda
party's agenda=party2's agenda(we assume party2's working for the people)
assemblymen's agenda remain the same
so nothing has change basically....

but what if the party's agenda is different...

party's agenda =/= party2's agenda
MP switch to party 2 because of its agenda...so there will be two possibilities....

1. MP's agenda = people's agenda = party2's agenda (therefore the switching)
2. MP's agenda = people's agenda =/= party's agenda (therefore the switching)

but intially the MP is voted under the first party agenda so we will assume.....
people's agenda=party's agenda

so which one has the same agenda as the people's?
if both has a different agenda then who has the agenda for the people?
if both party claim their agenda is for the people,then it will be like this....

party's agenda = people's agenda
party2's agenda = people's agenda
party's agenda = party2's agenda

so why political party?

am i right? hahahaha..the mathematical equation solves it all...


if only life is as simple as mathematical equation....